What goes in must come out, and in the case of phosphorus, too
much has been going into cows and coming out on farmlands. New
state and federal rules aimed at curbing runoff pollution are
going to affect many Wisconsin farms.
The bad news: surveys show that phosphorus levels in most
Wisconsin farm soils are too high, and if they conduct business as
usual, many dairy farms will not be able to comply with the
proposed phosphorus rules.
The good news: proper whole-farm phosphorus management will
allow most of those farms to meet the regulations, according to
Mark Powell, an agroecologist at the USDA-ARS Dairy Forage
Research Center.
Powell has studied how phosphorus management in one dairy
system component (e.g. feed) affects other system components
(soils and crops), and how whole-farm phosphorus management can
help producers comply with forthcoming nutrient management
regulations. He discussed his findings Jan. 15 at the Wisconsin
Fertilizer, Aglime & Pest Management Conference.
In 1999, 75 percent of the major soils in Wisconsin tested
above high (24 ppm) and 50 percent tested greater than excessively
high (38 ppm) in phosphorus levels, according to UW-Madison
studies. On dairy farms, these increases usually occurred because
imports of phosphorus in feed and fertilizer exceeded exports in
milk, cattle, and surplus grain or hay.
Many of the environmental problems facing animal agriculture
are due to the separation of livestock production from its feed
supply, Powell says. Swine and poultry operations usually import
their feed, and new phosphorus regulations will pose major hurdles
for those industries.
On the other hand, most Wisconsin dairy operations raise most
of their own feed and recycle manure through cropland. Powell's
research has shown that most state dairy farms have stocking rates
of less than 0.44 cows per acre, the threshold value for
self-sufficiency in forage and grain production. Self-sufficiency
means that a farm has adequate land to recycle its manure
phosphorus through crops.
Self-sufficient stocking rates will vary from farm to farm.
Farms feeding recommended levels of phosphorus and spreading
manure on all their available cropland can maintain higher
stocking rates without increasing phosphorus runoff than farms
feeding phosphorus excessively and spreading manure on only parts
of their cropland, Powell notes.
"On many dairy farms, the phosphorus problem originates not so
much from excessive stocking rates but rather from a combination
of high dietary phosphorus levels and inadequate utilization of
available cropland for manure spreading," Powell says.
Balancing phosphorus inputs and outputs through proper feed,
fertilizer and manure management is the first step toward reducing
soil phosphorus buildup and runoff phosphorus losses from dairy
farms. Farmers and their nutrient management consultants need to
look at the whole-farm nutrient package, Powell says, and develop
ways to manage nutrients more efficiently to increase profits and
conform to nutrient management regulations.
The National Research Council recommends that diets for
high-producing cows contain 0.38 percent phosphorus, with 0.48
percent recommended for the first three weeks of
lactation. However, when he surveyed Wisconsin farms, Powell found
that the phosphorus content of dairy diets ranged from 0.23
percent to 0.85 percent phosphorus. About 85 percent of the
surveyed dairy farms fed phosphorus in excess of NRC requirements,
and more than half of all cows were fed phosphorus in excess of
0.38 percent.
More dietary phosphorus produces more manure phosphorus. As far
as crops are concerned, manure has too much phosphorus and not
enough nitrogen. Repeatedly applying manure to meet the nitrogen
needs of crops will cause phosphorus to accumulate in the soil,
increasing the risk of runoff. If new rules restrict manure
application to cropland to prevent phosphorus accumulation,
supplementing dairy diets with inorganic phosphorus will increase
the cropland requirement for manure phosphorus recycling
dramatically, Powell says.
Farms that produce manure phosphorus in excess of crop
phosphorus requirements need to amend feed and/or fertilizer
practices, seek additional land for manure application, export
manure, and/or reduce animal numbers on their farms if they are to
achieve phosphorus balance, Powell says. Amending feed and
fertilizer practices is the simplest, quickest and cheapest
solution for most Wisconsin dairy farmers, he points out.
On Wisconsin farms where manure phosphorus exceeded crop
phosphorus requirements, lactating cows were fed, on average, 30
percent more phosphorus than NRC recommends for their level of
milk production. Adopting NRC’s dietary phosphorus recommendations
would reduce the number of farms and amount of land in positive
phosphorus balance by two-thirds, he says.
Some dairy farmers could eliminate phosphorus supplements but
still have problems, because common protein supplements contain a
wide range of phosphorus concentrations. For example, meat and
bone meal has a protein:phosphorus ratio of 11 to 1; corn gluten
meal's ratio is 108 to 1. On dairy farms with high soil phosphorus
levels, low-phosphorus protein supplements could reduce manure
phosphorus and the land required for manure application.
"Balancing phosphorus inputs and outputs through integrated
feed, fertilizer and manure management is quickly becoming the
principal regulatory challenge facing the U.S. dairy industry,"
Powell says. "Feed consultants and veterinarians need to know that
their dietary phosphorus recommendations could very well be the
most critical element of a farmer’s ability to comply with
nutrient management regulations, especially for farmers having
limited cropland area upon which they can spread manure. The link
between dietary practices and water quality impairment needs to be
incorporated into whole-farm nutrient management planning."